[2018] NZEmpC 4 Ioan v Scott Technology NZ Ltd t/a Rocklabs (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 15 February 2018 NINETY-DAY TRIAL PERIOD – unjustifiable dismissal – unjustifiable disadvantage – validity of trial provision – requirement of notice – whether notice given in accordance with employment agreement – trial period valid – unjustifiable dismissal claim barred – unjustifiable disadvantage not found.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3640 items matching your search terms
-
[2018] NZEmpC 4 Ioan v Scott Technology NZ Ltd t/a Rocklabs [PDF, 340 KB] -
[2018] NZEmpC 3 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd [PDF, 221 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 3 Kazemi v Rightway Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 13 February 2018) APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL – procedural route – whether challenge to determination or special leave appropriate – important question of law – application for special leave granted.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 2 Black v Yankee Bourbon Co Ltd [PDF, 90 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 2 Black v Yankee Bourbon Company Ltd (Consent Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 2 February 2018) CONSENT – full and final settlement agreement – order prohibiting publication except for enforcement purposes.
-
[2018] NZEmpC 1 FGH v RST [PDF, 214 KB] [2018] NZEmpC 1 FGH v RST (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 2 February 2018) APPLICATION FOR INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION ORDER – health and safety issue - evidence of adverse health consequences of publication – defendant willing to abide by decision of the Court – order granted – extends to related Authority determinations.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 166 Sawyer v VC of Victoria University [PDF, 425 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 166 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 December 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – PENALTIES – penalties ordered by Authority for breach of settlement agreement – validity of agreement disputed – proceedings in Court – factors in granting stay considered – overall interests of justice favour not ordering a stay – application dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 165 Roach v Nazareth Care [PDF, 320 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 165 Roach v Nazareth Care Charitable Trust Board (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 December 2017) APPLICATION TO REMOVE MATTER TO COURT – whether 90-trial period valid when plaintiff accepted second position after being offered first – tests for removal considered – discretion exercised in favour of plaintiff – application successful.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 164 NZPSA v IRD [PDF, 519 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 164 New Zealand Public Service Assoc Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi v Commissioner and Chief Executive Inland Revenue Department Te Tari Taake (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 21 December 2017) REPRESENTATION –whether defendant breached ss 32 and 236 when negotiating directly with individuals over restructured positions - s 32 does not apply as issue relates to a change process, not collective bargaining – Part 6 applies, not Part 5 – s 236 breached - defendant should have dealt with union as instructed by members – good faith obligations apply – union’s challenge succeeds.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 163 Briscoe v Oceania Dairy Ltd [PDF, 192 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 163 Briscoe v Oceania Dairy Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 19 December 2017) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CHALLENGE OUT OF TIME – grounds for application considered – insufficient explanation – insufficient evidence of merits to overcome omission to file on time – application dismissed.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 162 NZPSA v IRD [PDF, 110 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 162 New Zealand Public Service Assoc Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi v Commissioner and Chief Executive Inland Revenue Department Te Tari Taake (Interim Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 19 December 2017) RESTRUCTURING - REPRESENTATION – COLLECTIVE BARGAINING – offers made prior to initiation of bargaining – s 32 does not apply – s 236 applied considering also CEA and good faith – plaintiff dealt with employees directly when instructed to send communications to union – s 236 breached.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 161 Aslam v Transportation Auckland Corp Ltd [PDF, 284 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 161 Aslam v Transportation Auckland Corp Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 14 December 2017) UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – serious misconduct alleged – employer complied with collective agreement – fair process – dismissal justified.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 160 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs (NZ) Ltd [PDF, 148 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 160 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs (New Zealand) Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 14 December 2017) APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO COURT DOCUMENTS – Senior Court (access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 applied – considerations in rule 12 – unspecified search amounts to fishing expedition – application declined.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 159 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [PDF, 328 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 159 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd (Costs Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 14 December 2017) COSTS – indemnity costs sought – increased costs allowed on basis of Calderbank offers and witness issues – uplift to allow for GST – other grounds not sufficient to increase costs award – orders for $120,197 (Court); $18,000 (Authority); $40,641.92 (disbursements).
-
[2017] EmpC 158 Car Haulaways Ltd v First Union Inc [PDF, 282 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 158 Car Haulaways Ltd v First Union Inc (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 12 December 2017) STRIKE – INTERIM INJUNCTION – urgency – Pickwick hearing - order restraining strike – notice of continuous strike not sufficient – joint purpose unlawful – overall justice favoured granting injunction.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 157 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Co Ltd [PDF, 375 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 157 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Co Ltd (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 11 December 2017) REMOVAL OF PROCEEDINGS – EXTENSION OF TIME TO CHALLENGE – whether s179 or s 178(3) available when Authority declines application to remove – statutory interpretation – s 178(3) appropriate route – Act does not contemplate two alternative routes for challenge - questions as formed at Authority do not constrain applicant or Court – no presumption for or against removal to Court- what constitutes important issue of law considered - important of law established - application granted.
-
[2017] EmpC 156 Coomer v JA McCallum & Son Ltd [PDF, 309 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 156 Coomer v JA McCallum and Son Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 8 December 2017) COSTS – SUCCESSFUL PARTY – unjustified disadvantage claim successful at Authority – constructive dismissal claim dismissed – wages claim unsuccessful – successful party awarded costs but reduced to recognise partial lack of success – plaintiff achieved success only through lodging claim – amount reduced to reflect partial success of defendant - $4500 awarded to plaintiff.
-
[2017] EmpC 155 Quality Consumables v Hannah [PDF, 150 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 155 Quality Consumables Ltd v Hannah (interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge M E Perkins, 7 December 2017) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – relevant principles considered – interests of justice considered – security for costs of $15,000 ordered.
-
[2017] EmpC 154 Sawyer v Victoria University [PDF, 330 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 154 Sawyer v Vice-Chancellor of the Victoria University of Wellington (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith Relating to Privilege, 7 December 2017) PRIVILEGE – WAIVER BY CONDUCT – whether waiver occurred in claiming miscommunication with lawyer over instructions – waiver case law canvassed – plaintiff had waived privilege but only in relation to specified communications.
-
[2017] EmpC 153 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [PDF, 479 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 153 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 6 December 2017) DISCLOSURE- FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS – range of orders considered and made for specific particulars – disclosure requirements considered – specific discovery categories determined according to relevance and privilege – orders made – no further interlocutory application to be filed except by leave of a judge.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 152 Performance Cleaners v Chinan [PDF, 546 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 152 Performance Cleaners All Property Services Wellington Ltd v Chinan (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 1 December 2017) STRIKE-OUT APPLICATION – ABUSE OF PROCESS – JURISDICTION - claim fails to meet criteria for strike-out – evidence not persuasive on abuse of process – but strike-out claim succeeds through lack of jurisdiction.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 151 Zara's Turkish v Kocaturk [PDF, 160 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 151 Zara’s Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 29 November 2017) APPLICATION FOR STAY – principles considered – stay granted subject to specified conditions.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 150 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [PDF, 492 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 150 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd (Judgment of the Full Court, 29 November 2017) LABOUR-HIRE AGENCY – TRIANGULAR RELATIONSHIPS - identity of employer – consideration of development of labour-hire arrangements and potential issues - s 6 analysis appropriate –formal contract a relevant factor only - test is real nature of the relationship – common law tests applied – contract of service declared.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 149 P v A [PDF, 184 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 149 P v A (Interlocutory Judgment (No 2) of Judge M E Perkins, 27 November 2017) APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL – consideration of grounds – Saxmere test of “fair-minded lay observer” applied – recusal declined.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 148 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry [PDF, 107 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 148 Crimson Consulting Ltd & Unitutor Ltd v Berry (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill on non-Publication, 23 November 2017) NON-PUBLICATION – discontinuance – permanent non-publication of commercially sensitive information and irrelevant allegations – file may not be searched without leave of a judge.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 147 BBS Horticulture Ltd v Labour Inspector, MBIE [PDF, 99 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 147 BBS Horticulture Ltd v A Labour inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Judgment of Chief Judge Christina Inglis, 22 November 2017) STRIKE-OUT APPLICATION – unopposed – no response by plaintiff – application granted.
-
[2017] NZEmpC 146 Yu v Zespri International Ltd [PDF, 767 KB] [2017] NZEmpC 146 Yu v Zespri International Ltd (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 17 November 2017) DISCLOSURE – general obligations considered – legal and litigation privilege where in-house counsel involved – specific rulings in Appendix.