[2020] NZEmpC 24 CBA v ONM (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 10 March 2020) COSTS –GUIDELINE SCALE – various steps discussed in depth – reduction of 30% made for partial success – Calderbank offer was reasonable to reject in the circumstances – the fact that the losing party was a large government organisation does not merit an increase to full scale costs.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
3709 items matching your search terms
-
[2020] NZEmpC 24 CBA v ONM [PDF, 327 KB] -
[2020] NZEmpC 23 Rudling v Bridgestone New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 102 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 23 Rudling v Bridgestone New Zealand Ltd (Consent Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 9 March 2020) CONSENT – s 149 settlement agreement signed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 21 A Labour Inspector v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd [PDF, 142 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 21 A Labour Inspector v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd (in administration) (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 3 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – incomplete information on financial circumstances – bankruptcy would not necessarily prevent rehearing application from proceeding – grounds for application are weak – stay not granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 22 Carruthers v Brommel Roofing Ltd [PDF, 132 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 22 Carruthers v Brommel Roofing Ltd (Oral Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 2 March 2020) FINE FOR BREACH OF COMPLIANCE ORDER – parties signed a mediated settlement agreement – company has failed to pay – no reason for failure was provided – company fined $10,000.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 20 Kohli v Brahmbhatt [PDF, 157 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 20 Kohli v Brahmbhatt (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 2 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – evidence that company is operating under a new name to avoid payment – application granted - APPLICATION FOR STAY – evidence that the company cannot afford to pay remedies awarded by Authority – stay awarded with condition that full amount is paid to the Court.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 19 Kenny Omen Ltd v Kumar [PDF, 288 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 19 Kenny Omen Ltd v Kumar (Stay Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 2 March 2020) Company has been liquidated and liquidators are not interested in the proceeding – proceedings stayed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 18 Kenny Omen Ltd v Singh [PDF, 292 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 18 Kenny Omen Ltd v Singh (Stay Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 2 March 2020) Company has been liquidated and liquidators are not interested in the proceeding – proceedings stayed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 16 Evans v JNJ Management Ltd [PDF, 138 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 16 Evans v JNJ Management Ltd (Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 2 March 2020) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME – deadline was missed by one day – application would only not be granted if case could be considered hopeless – case is not hopeless – application granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 17 Canterbury Westland Free Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes [PDF, 124 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 17 Canterbury Westland Free Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 27 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE – dispute involving the interpretation or operation of a collective agreement – union party and Secretary for Education had proper interest in the interpretation of issue – leave granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 15 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd [PDF, 634 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 15 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 27 February 2020) COSTS – costs guideline scale not appropriate because of brevity of submissions - $4,000 awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 14 Thorne v Rolton [PDF, 310 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 14 Thorne v Rolton (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 26 February 2020) COSTS – COSTS GUIDELINE SCALE.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 13 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd [PDF, 223 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 13 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge Chief Judge C Inglis, 26 February 2020) COSTS – costs guideline scale – adjustments made for Calderbank offer – award not reduced for reasons of ability of pay – Authority costs award discussed – whether Authority’s notional daily rate is generally appropriate.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 12 Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd [PDF, 302 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 12 Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment No.3 of Judge K G Smith, 21 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR WASTED COSTS – costs awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 11 Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd [PDF, 222 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 11 Cooper v Phoenix Publishing Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment No.2 of Judge K G Smith, 21 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO DEFEND – statement of defence not filed on time – company did not file application and did not attend conference – proceeding struck out for want of prosecution.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 10 Holland v OCS Ltd [PDF, 291 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 10 Holland v OCS Ltd (Oral Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 21 February 2020) PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – TIME LIMITATION – grievance lodged in the Authority outside of the s 114(6) limitation period – challenge cannot proceed.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 9 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [PDF, 236 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 9 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 20 February 2020) COSTS – costs guideline scale – Calderbank offer – rejection of Calderbank offer appropriate because sum awarded was significantly higher than offer – employee only partially successful – 25% of normal costs awarded.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 8 Visagie v WorkSafe New Zealand [PDF, 136 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 8 Visagie v WorkSafe New Zealand (Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 18 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO REMOVE PROCEEDINGS TO THE COURT – important question of law regarding interpretation of collective agreement – availability of damages for breach of good faith – Authority well placed to deal with the matter – leave
-
[2020] NZEmpC 7 Adventure Playground Rotorua Ltd v Isaac [PDF, 129 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 7 Adventure Playground Rotorua Ltd v Isaac (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge J C Holden, 18 February 2020) GOOD FAITH REPORT – company delayed investigation initially but eventually engaged with the process – not appropriate to limit the ambit of the challenge.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 6 Dollar King Ltd v Jun [PDF, 105 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 6 Dollar King Ltd v Jun (Consent Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 17 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – CONSENT.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 5 Duncan v Southern Milk Transport Ltd [PDF, 316 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 5 Duncan v Southern Milk Transport Ltd (Costs Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 17 February 2020) COSTS – GUIDELINE SCALE.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 4 Innovative Landscapes (2015) Ltd v Popkin [PDF, 137 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 4 Innovative Landscapes (2015) Ltd v Popkin (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 10 February 2020) APPLICATION TO HEAR EVIDENCE AT A DISTANCE – evidence via audio-visual link – Courts (Remote Participation) Act 2010, s 5 – fair trial – application granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 3 Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes [PDF, 127 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 3 Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Assoc Inc v Barnes (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 7 February 2020) APPLICATION FOR STAY – potential difficulty repaying award – stay granted.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 2 A Labour Inspector v Jeet Holdings [PDF, 264 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 2 A Labour Inspector v Jeet Holdings (Interlocutory Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 31 January 2020) APPLICATION FOR VARIATION OF A FREEZING ORDER – creditor has security over property – initial freezing order prevented sale of property – order varied to allow sale.
-
[2020] NZEmpC 1 Tupuanga v Auckland Meat Processors Ltd [PDF, 120 KB] [2020] NZEmpC 1 Tupuanga v Auckland Meat Processors Ltd (Interlocutory Judgment of Chief Judge C Inglis, 28 January 2020) APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS – no evidence of impecuniosity – application dismissed.
-
[2019] NZEmpC 198 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd [PDF, 379 KB] [2019] NZEmpC 198 Jobbitt v 4 Seasons Indoor Outdoor Living (2014) Ltd (Judgment of Judge K G Smith, 20 December 2019) STRIKE OUT – 90 day trial period – whether proper notice was given of dismissal – termination notice referred to clause but not exact period of leave – notice was valid – strike out application successful.