Appellate judgments 2022
Supreme Court
[2022] NZSC 158 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Limited [PDF, 41 KB]
[2022] NZSC 117 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 177 KB]
[2022] NZSC 69 TUV v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [PDF, 279 KB]
[2022] NZSC 15 Head and Ors v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department and Anor [PDF, 178 KB] APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL - no question of law of general public importance - application declined.
[2022] NZSC 9 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Limited [PDF, 159 KB] APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - APPLICATION TO ADDUCE NEW EVIDENCE - APPLICATION FOR STAY - no grounds for applications - applications declined.
Court of Appeal
[2022] NZCA 516 Maheta v Skybus NZ Limited [PDF, 217 KB]
[2022] NZCA 461 Attorney-General v Fleming [PDF, 213 KB]
[2022] NZCA 407 Board of Trustees of Melville High School v Cronin-Lampe [PDF, 214 KB]
[2022] NZCA 398 H v Employment Relations Authority [PDF, 186 KB]
[2022] NZCA 342 Commissioner of Police v NZ Police Association Incorporated [PDF, 215 KB]
[2022] NZCA 339 Lawton v Stock [PDF, 154 KB]
[2022] NZCA 260 H v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [PDF, 182 KB]
[2022] NZCA 241 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board
[2022] NZCA 211 Mount Cook Airline Limited v E Tū Incorporated [PDF, 175 KB]
[2022] NZCA 195 Caddy v Vice Chancellor, University of Auckland [PDF, 184 KB]
[2022] NZCA 194 Lawton v Stock [PDF, 236 KB]
[2022] NZCA 173 Claxton v Smiths City (Southern) Limited (In Receivership) [PDF, 133 KB]
[2022] NZCA 148 ABC v DEF [PDF, 178 KB]
[2022] NZCA 92 Director-General of Health v Humphries [PDF, 171 KB] APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – definition of homeworker – application granted.
[2022] NZCA 12 Kennedy v Employment Relations Authority and others [PDF, 197 KB] APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW - available grounds of review of Employment Court by Court of Appeal are limited - no arguable grounds - application dismissed.
[2022] NZCA 1 Te Manawa O Tūhoe Trust v McDonnell [PDF, 165 KB] APPLICATION FOR STAY - employee would be negatively impacted by not being reinstated - balance of convenience favours employee - application declined.